Uber's payment algorithm sparks discontent – drivers set to sue the platform operator

The dispute over Uber drivers' pay is intensifying. In the United Kingdom and several European countries, drivers want to sue Uber over unfair, algorithmically determined pay and are seeking compensation for lost earnings and for a breach of data protection.

An algorithm controls Uber drivers' pay - for the drivers, the system is extremely opaque.| Photo: Uber
An algorithm controls Uber drivers' pay - for the drivers, the system is extremely opaque.| Photo: Uber

The organization Worker Info Exchange International (WIE International) has served the company with a so-called Letter Before Action – the formal precursor to a lawsuit. In it, the foundation demands that Uber stop its dynamic compensation system and compensate affected drivers.

The letter was addressed to Uber BV in Amsterdam and Uber Technologies in the USA. WIE International accuses the group of breaches of European data protection rules. Specifically, it concerns automated decisions by which Uber has been determining the pay of its drivers in real time since 2020. The system is called Up Front Pricing and replaces fixed tariffs with variable prices computed by algorithms.

Income down, control diminished

The debate centers on whether the system disadvantages drivers. Studies provide indications for this. A study by the University of Oxford and WIE International from this year shows that 82 percent of British Uber drivers have earned less per hour since the introduction of the dynamic system. The commission they pay to Uber now often exceeds half of the fare — previously it was 25 percent. At the same time, drivers' control over when and where they work has diminished. WIE International estimates the average loss of income at 8 to 16 percent in the past year.

The organisation sees this as a compensation model that personalises rates, but reveals little about the criteria. Full-time drivers would thus in some shifts be far below the minimum wage after costs are deducted.

Amsterdam could become the scene

If Uber does not meet the demands, WIE International intends to file a class-action lawsuit with the Amsterdam District Court. The basis would be the Dutch Act on Collective Redress. Drivers from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and other European countries could join. WIE International is currently reviewing compensation systems in other states, so the case could be expanded.

The allegations are clear: The company uses personal data and profiling to train algorithms, without obtaining the drivers' consent. Additionally, driver data were unlawfully transferred to the United States between August 2021 and November 2023. As a result, they would potentially have been exposed to access by U.S. authorities.

James Farrar, Director of Worker Info Exchange, criticizes the practice sharply. Uber had used artificial intelligence to "introduce invasive systems for determining pay," which had affected the livelihoods of many drivers. The lawsuit should not only compensate financial losses but contribute to transparent working conditions.

Cost risk mitigated

WIE International organizes, together with unions, participation in the possible class action. The proceedings would be financed by Innsworth Capital, an independent litigation funder. For the drivers, it is thus guaranteed that costs will not be incurred before a court awards compensation.

Who is behind the initiative

WIE International is a charitable foundation based in the Netherlands. It advocates responsible handling of data and artificial intelligence in the workplace and represents workers on various platforms in questions of data protection.

Whether Uber fulfills the demands or the dispute ends up in court remains open. What is certain is only that the dispute over algorithmic control and fair pay in the platform sector has reached a new dimension.

 

 

Content automatically translated.
Logobanner Liste (Views)