2 Ausgaben kostenlos für Sie
Fachmagazin taxi heute: Ihr Zugang zu exklusiven Inhalten rund um die Taxi- und Mietwagenbranche.
Aktueller Termin
Meist gelesen
Italy's taxi trade on the streets – and this time not closed
Anyone looking for a taxi on August 27 in Rome, Milan or Naples sometimes had to be patient. Italy's taxi drivers had called for a nationwide strike. From 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., many vehicles stayed in depots. The impact was particularly evident at the capital's airports. According to the ANSA news agency, at the two main airports in Rome, at times less than half of the normally available taxis were on the road.
The protest targets developments that are also familiar in other European countries: the growing influence of digital platforms such as Uber and political plans to open the market for ride-hailing further. For many Italian taxi drivers, more is at stake than competition from an app. They see the fundamental principles of the traditional taxi market as endangered.
Dispute over the market's future
The conflict has simmered in Italy for years. Unlike in many other European countries, the taxi trade there remains heavily regulated. The number of licenses is limited, tariffs are set by authorities, and access to the market is subject to strict rules. Precisely this structure, according to the strike organizers, is what they want to loosen. The trigger for the current protest is a draft law that many taxi associations see as a step toward deregulation. The fear: platform providers could gain additional opportunities to broker ride services and thereby alter competition to the detriment of the traditional taxi trade.
For the supporters of the strike, it is therefore a fundamental question. They argue that taxi companies, as part of the public transport service, are subject to special obligations—from the obligation to transport passengers, to tariff commitments, and to extensive safety and licensing requirements. If new market participants were not subject to the same rules, distortions of competition would arise.
Uber remains the symbol of the conflict
Although the political discussion is clearly more complex, public perception continues to focus on Uber. The US corporation stands as a symbol for a platform economy that challenges traditional regulations for many Italian taxi drivers.
The dispute has a long history in Italy. Taxi associations have warned for years about a relaxation of the statutory requirements for the so-called “public transport without fixed routes.” Uritaxi, one of the country’s most influential taxi organizations, has repeatedly spoken out against models that, in its view, approach liberalization modeled after Uber Pop. In doing so, the organization regularly points to issues of safety, control, and equal treatment of all market participants.
Why Uritaxi did not join the strike
Notably, however, the strike did not unite the entire industry. Ironically, Uritaxi did not participate in the walkout. After talks with the Italian government about the planned draft bill, the organization withdrew its support. It subsequently described the strike as “incomprehensible.” The background appears to be the assessment that negotiations with the government have not yet concluded and that political solutions can be reached more at the negotiating table than on the street. The organization had previously signaled openness to a dialogue about the future design of the market. This showed a split in strategy within the Italian taxi trade. While the striking associations want to build public pressure, Uritaxi relies on direct talks with policymakers.
A European-dimensioned conflict
For German taxi operators, the view toward Italy is likely familiar. The central points of contention resemble the debates here at home: How far may the legislator open markets? What rules must apply to platform providers? And how can it be ensured that taxi and rental-car companies compete under comparable conditions?
The Italian strike provides no answers to that. However, it shows that the discussion about platform-based mobility and market regulation is not a national issue. From Rome to Berlin, politics, platforms and trade associations are wrangling over the same question: How much competition can a transport market tolerate, while it is also supposed to fulfill public tasks?
Content automatically translated.
Taxi-Fahrzeuge (Pkw) , Taxi-Newsletter, Taxameter, Taxi-Fahrer , BZP – Deutscher Taxi- und Mietwagenverband , Straßenverkehrsordnung (StVO) , Krankenbeförderung , Weiterbildung , Taxi-Konzessionen , Verkehrspolitik , Mietwagenbranche , Taxi-Apps , Berufskraftfahrer-Qualifikations-Gesetz BKrFQG) , Taxizentralen , Personal, Gehälter, Arbeitsschutz , Wirtschaftsnachrichten , Werbung , Taxi-Folierung , Taxi-Umrüster , Straßenverkehr , Elektromobilität, Taxifuhrpark und -flottenmanagement , Taxi-Versicherungen , Hybrid, Diesel, Erdgas , Taxi-Magazin
